|
|
Post by hollis on Nov 23, 2008 3:59:40 GMT -5
1) What do I make of the recent EM interference in my house? I have an RF controlled dog door. My dog wears a transmitter on his collar. When he is WELL outside the range of the door, the door opens anyways. And then closes anyways. Nothing I have done gets this bugger to stop accepting "alien" signals.
2) In what city were you born?
|
|
|
|
Post by Caligastia Lanonandek on Nov 23, 2008 16:49:40 GMT -5
1. I don't know
2. why do you care?
|
|
|
|
Post by hollis on Nov 23, 2008 18:39:33 GMT -5
I care because I am trying to link a curious UFO event from the mid 20th century to you. You could send it as a private message on here if you felt like divulging it. If not, no bother.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caligastia Lanonandek on Nov 23, 2008 23:39:39 GMT -5
Logically, you'd not be able to make such a connection.
However, at one time, I bought the entire database and compared it to dates in my life
I considered anamolous. The hit rate was 100%.
|
|
|
|
Post by hollis on Nov 23, 2008 23:47:32 GMT -5
I don't understand how logically I would NOT be able to make a connection. But anyways, you answered the question in a roundabout way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caligastia Lanonandek on Nov 24, 2008 3:19:48 GMT -5
Every ufo sighting on the planet isn't related to me and there is no way for you to cross connect them without knowing what I know of my life. A mere location won't do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by hollis on Nov 25, 2008 2:16:09 GMT -5
Disregard my question. Further analysis didn't fit my original conclusion, and you are right, every UFO isn't related to you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caligastia Lanonandek on Nov 25, 2008 15:09:35 GMT -5
Hollis
I had a cleric challenge me to prove that John of Patmos is, in fact, The Apostle John. This is one of those nit picky arguements Christians have been having for centuries. He set a logical trap. He proposed that I needed to exclude all Bibical Johns from contention on the assumption that the last John standing would be the Apostle.
Proof has to be proactive and this proposition isn't and is based upon a false premise.
The evidence is found on John 1:15 and Rev 1:9. In both instances, John creates a preamble in his text with the major characters appearing first. Then he underlines the preamble with a first person declaration. In both cases, the operative words are I and John.
There are other points of methodology in play as well. The use of the same methodology between both works identify that the writers of both documents are one and the same. Emphasis to the point that this appears ONLY in these two documents and no where else in the Bible.
Your original proposition assumed my presence with regards to ufos. If there's a sighting in Chicago and I've never been in Chicago - the theory fails.
Also, I have a long standing policy of not putting stats out. Given identity theft and various other miscreances - I see no point. Old Fat and Ugly pretty much covers it.
|
|
