|
Things
May 10, 2009 21:02:11 GMT -5
Post by hollis on May 10, 2009 21:02:11 GMT -5
I do appreciate frankness. And for it is worth, while I think you are tough on me, I do not think that it is unnecessary, nor do I think I have ever cried "ow" and asked you to let up.
|
|
|
Things
May 10, 2009 23:29:26 GMT -5
Post by Caligastia on May 10, 2009 23:29:26 GMT -5
I suspect that Dinah has an expectation of high and holy instead of down to earth and finds my willingness to confront contradictory with her expectations even though they are 100% consistent with my methodologies and my presentations.
When a person does something stupid, you should tell him its stupid. He can still continue to do it - but at least the truth is on the table. This applies also to ascendancy issues.
|
|
|
Things
May 11, 2009 23:42:51 GMT -5
Post by hollis on May 11, 2009 23:42:51 GMT -5
In the twelve years I have been reading what you write and interacting with you, I have never expected nor seen you act high and holy. It is indeed one hundred percent compatible with the methods you present here.
|
|
|
Things
May 12, 2009 0:01:37 GMT -5
Post by Caligastia on May 12, 2009 0:01:37 GMT -5
Love and lighters prefer their fantasies of what they 'believe' should be over the reality of what is. You can not accomodate both truth and the fantasy. The Revelation Code scenario predicts a shove in your face methodology where denial no longer becomes a practical option.
I file this under tough love - another concept not favored by the love and lighter. Even so, the love is there.
|
|
|
Things
Mar 7, 2023 17:29:05 GMT -5
Post by . on Mar 7, 2023 17:29:05 GMT -5
.
|
|